Several hard roles at once
A cluster of niche seats that will each take real research, not one easy req you could post.
Services
A dedicated recruiter operating inside your hiring process. You get research depth, weekly reporting and comp intelligence, and you keep the pipeline when the engagement ends.
One accountable recruiter works your roles inside your systems and your interview loop. The engagement covers calibration, market mapping, direct outreach, screening against agreed scorecards, weekly reporting, offer support and handover of every research artifact produced along the way.
When compensation depends on a single placement, the incentive is to submit quickly and often. When the engagement is scoped around capacity and research, the incentive is to be right about the market, which includes telling you when the scope, comp band or location makes the role unfillable as written.
Triggers
A cluster of niche seats that will each take real research, not one easy req you could post.
Your recruiters are covering volume hiring and cannot go deep on commissioning or platform roles.
Comp bands, supply density and competitor org structure matter as much as the hires themselves.
The research and pipeline should belong to your team when the engagement ends.
Model comparison
No fee until a hire starts
Optimized for speed and volume; no market intelligence; the same candidates are sent to your competitors.
Long-term ownership and employer brand
Rarely has niche network access; ramp time on a new discipline can exceed the hiring deadline.
Committed senior-level effort
Priced per role; best reserved for a small number of executive or highly confidential seats.
Capacity, method and intelligence for a defined scope, pipeline transfers to you
Requires your engagement: named sponsor, approved comp, 48-hour feedback. Not a fire-and-forget option.
Engagements
When it fits: A defined set of hard roles that need a dedicated recruiter inside your process now.
When it fits: You need recruiting leadership and process design without adding a permanent TA hire.
When it fits: A site leadership, engineering leadership or confidential replacement seat that warrants retained focus.
When it fits: You need to know whether the role is fillable before committing to a search.
Reporting
Sample embedded engagement report
Illustrative reporting format. Sample data shown for demonstration only.
| Signal | Week 3 | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Roles in engagement | 4 | Two commissioning, two operations |
| Target universe mapped | 412 | Named, by discipline and metro |
| Outreach completed | 236 | Human-sent, sequenced weekly |
| Screened candidates | 22 | Against agreed scorecards |
| Submitted | 11 | With written cases and risks |
| In client process | 6 | Panel or final stage |
| Blockers raised | 1 | Comp band trailing market by one tier |
Method
A written role brief, an agreed scorecard, and a market reality check on scope, comp and location before outreach starts.
AI-assisted mapping across AI infrastructure companies, operators, EPCs and OEMs, layered on a network built one conversation at a time.
Direct, human outreach with weekly reporting on volume, response quality and the objections we are hearing.
Structured screens against the scorecard, written candidate cases including risks, and comp expectations on the record.
Offer strategy, counteroffer exposure assessment, and resignation and relocation support through the start date.
Your team keeps the pipeline, research files, messaging and comp data. The work stays with you when the engagement ends.
What the engagement requires from you
We commit to delivery standards, research depth, outreach volume, reporting cadence and response times. Outcomes depend on market conditions, scope, compensation and process speed.
FAQ
Bring the role set and the deadline. We'll recommend embedded, retained, intelligence-first, or nothing at all.